Lawyering Paradoxes: Making Meaning of the Contradictions
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Avoiding Contradictions in the Paradoxes, the Halting Problem, and Diagonalization
The fundamental proposal in this article is that logical formulas of the form (f ↔ ¬f) are not contradictions, and that formulas of the form (t ↔ t) are not tautologies. Such formulas, wherever they appear in mathematics, are instead reason to conclude that f and t have a third truth value, different from true and false. These formulas are circular definitions of f and t. We can interpret the i...
متن کاملThe Essence of Information: Paradoxes, Contradictions, and Solutions
The information age is upon us and the main paradox is that there is no satisfactory and commonly accepted answer to the crucial question what information is. This results in a quantity of contradictions, misconceptions, and paradoxes related to the world of information. We consider the existing situation in information studies, which is very paradoxical and inconsistent, in the first part of t...
متن کاملon the comparison of keyword and semantic-context methods of learning new vocabulary meaning
the rationale behind the present study is that particular learning strategies produce more effective results when applied together. the present study tried to investigate the efficiency of the semantic-context strategy alone with a technique called, keyword method. to clarify the point, the current study seeked to find answer to the following question: are the keyword and semantic-context metho...
15 صفحه اولImplicational paradoxes and the meaning of logical constants
We discuss paradoxes of implication in the setting of a proof-conditional theory of meaning for logical constants. We argue that a proper logic of implication should be not only relevant, but also constructive and nonmonotonic. This leads us to select as a plausible candidate LL, a fragment of linear logic which differs from R in that it rejects both contraction and
متن کاملNew paradoxes of risky decision making.
During the last 25 years, prospect theory and its successor, cumulative prospect theory, replaced expected utility as the dominant descriptive theories of risky decision making. Although these models account for the original Allais paradoxes, 11 new paradoxes show where prospect theories lead to self-contradiction or systematic false predictions. The new findings are consistent with and, in sev...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: SSRN Electronic Journal
سال: 2019
ISSN: 1556-5068
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3477424